<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.talk.royalty Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty</link>
  <description>Discussion of royalty and nobility.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Dodgy Sultans and Datuks??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/47c7225d1822cb30?show_docid=47c7225d1822cb30</link>
  <description>
  It occurs to me that they do themselves no favours when the &#39;Grand &lt;br&gt; Master of the Royal Orders of Knighthood&#39; calls himself &#39;Dux de &lt;br&gt; Legaxpi and Duque de Vivar-Maniquiz&#39;. &lt;br&gt; Many of the &#39;Knights of the Order of Sulu seem to have ripped off &lt;br&gt; &#39;their&#39; coats of arms from the Bigot Roll. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://royalsulu.com/images/RK_100DatukdiPietrapiana.gif&amp;imgrefurl=http://royalsulu.com/orders4.html&amp;usg=__zaJtWTJHmet683S2vrg1JENj2pQ=&amp;h=286&amp;w=242&amp;sz=23&amp;hl=en&amp;start=11&amp;sig2=l-fOqFnRkYzgHw8Dsr_U6g&amp;itbs=1&amp;tbnid=3423EKK6duS9wM:&amp;tbnh=115&amp;tbnw=97&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Ditalian%2Bnobility%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&amp;ei=DTehS76IK9jNjAeP65jDDQ&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/47c7225d1822cb30?show_docid=47c7225d1822cb30</guid>
  <author>
  rick.lich...@virgin.net
  (Turenne)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 14:49:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Hungary.- Nicolaus Illeshazy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/161b6ce58c76193c/1bf68b87ecbd46dd?show_docid=1bf68b87ecbd46dd</link>
  <description>
  On 16 mar, 19:48, Ádám Mézes de Debreczen et Rettegh &lt;br&gt; For the couple Traun-I. see NoeS, II,373b, XIX
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/161b6ce58c76193c/1bf68b87ecbd46dd?show_docid=1bf68b87ecbd46dd</guid>
  <author>
  edespal...@yahoo.fr
  (edespalais@yahoo.fr)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 13:22:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Dodgy Sultans and Datuks??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/6754888e201723db?show_docid=6754888e201723db</link>
  <description>
  On Mar 18, 8:35 pm, &amp;quot;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.maltagenealogy.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; &amp;lt;tancarvil...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; It is a complete shambles. &lt;br&gt; The US &amp;quot;didn&#39;t do kings&amp;quot; so everything was virtually erased. From time &lt;br&gt; to time the central Philippine government recognises someone as Sultan &lt;br&gt; of Sulu, as part of their bid to claim Sabah territory and the oil
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/6754888e201723db?show_docid=6754888e201723db</guid>
  <author>
  susuha...@hotmail.co.uk
  (CJ Buyers)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 12:36:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Hungary.- Nicolaus Illeshazy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/161b6ce58c76193c/c2f4035a32915e66?show_docid=c2f4035a32915e66</link>
  <description>
  This text has to be improved: &lt;br&gt; Facsimile de la dernière page du manuscrit de la Pragmatique Sanction &lt;br&gt; Hongroise [avec les signatures autographes de Carolus (VI/III) mp et &lt;br&gt; du Comes Nicolaus (Miklós) Illeshazy de Eadem (se traduit par: de et à &lt;br&gt; Illeshaz ; 1653-1723), Hereditarÿ in Trenchin, ejusdemquæ Nominio ( ?)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/161b6ce58c76193c/c2f4035a32915e66?show_docid=c2f4035a32915e66</guid>
  <author>
  edespal...@yahoo.fr
  (edespalais@yahoo.fr)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 11:07:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Dodgy Sultans and Datuks??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/5c246006780c9f9a?show_docid=5c246006780c9f9a</link>
  <description>
  When Philippines become a republic or completely independent, was &lt;br&gt; there any entitlements to the Sultanates and rulers similar to &lt;br&gt; Indonesia or Malaysia? Any former inquiries from the Government and &lt;br&gt; body which still operates under the republic today?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/5c246006780c9f9a?show_docid=5c246006780c9f9a</guid>
  <author>
  tancarvil...@gmail.com
  (www.maltagenealogy.com)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 09:35:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Judges fear prisons will burst under new rules</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c7b310a84d096af4/352f21317bfd15df?show_docid=352f21317bfd15df</link>
  <description>
  Nah. Transportation!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c7b310a84d096af4/352f21317bfd15df?show_docid=352f21317bfd15df</guid>
  <author>
  susuha...@hotmail.co.uk
  (CJ Buyers)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 01:54:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Dodgy Sultans and Datuks??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/f4b697ea87f9986d?show_docid=f4b697ea87f9986d</link>
  <description>
  I am afraid that with these sultanates and rajas in the Philippines &lt;br&gt; one simply just does not care. &lt;br&gt; There are so many squabbling claiments for every branch and lineage &lt;br&gt; group that virtually everyone sooner or later proclaims himself &lt;br&gt; sultan. They then go about dishing out the dirt on their brothers and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/f4b697ea87f9986d?show_docid=f4b697ea87f9986d</guid>
  <author>
  susuha...@hotmail.co.uk
  (CJ Buyers)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 մար 2010 01:52:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using HOL writing paper for personal gain?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/8054b16142499585?show_docid=8054b16142499585</link>
  <description>
  Is there not a procedure for trying someone in the Houses of &lt;br&gt; Parliament by bringing them to the &#39;bar of the house&#39;? Some of those &lt;br&gt; that have rorted the system - as well as being tried in the regular &lt;br&gt; courts - should also be tried in the Lords and summarily dismissed. I &lt;br&gt; am sure the Prime Minister could easily find a replacement.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/8054b16142499585?show_docid=8054b16142499585</guid>
  <author>
  dbi...@aapt.net.au
  (Donald4564)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 21:01:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using HOL writing paper for personal gain?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/90a79c7ba215b43c?show_docid=90a79c7ba215b43c</link>
  <description>
  Thanks; that makes sense. &lt;br&gt; Richard
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/90a79c7ba215b43c?show_docid=90a79c7ba215b43c</guid>
  <author>
  rick.lich...@virgin.net
  (Turenne)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 20:33:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Betty&#39;s long term guest houses at bursting point!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c7b310a84d096af4/cd9e1c795ad17e20?show_docid=cd9e1c795ad17e20</link>
  <description>
  A problem easily solved by bringing back the rope!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c7b310a84d096af4/cd9e1c795ad17e20?show_docid=cd9e1c795ad17e20</guid>
  <author>
  h.laughl...@eggstra.co.nz
  (Katipo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 20:28:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Dodgy Sultans and Datuks??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/0e0c012a12ad623e?show_docid=0e0c012a12ad623e</link>
  <description>
  This looks exceedingly dodgy to me. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://royalsulu.com/images/RK_100DatukdiPietrapiana.gif&amp;imgrefurl=http://royalsulu.com/orders4.html&amp;usg=__zaJtWTJHmet683S2vrg1JENj2pQ=&amp;h=286&amp;w=242&amp;sz=23&amp;hl=en&amp;start=11&amp;sig2=l-fOqFnRkYzgHw8Dsr_U6g&amp;itbs=1&amp;tbnid=3423EKK6duS9wM:&amp;tbnh=115&amp;tbnw=97&amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Ditalian%2Bnobility%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&amp;ei=DTehS76IK9jNjAeP65jDDQ&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/d0a61db6c9136f4d/0e0c012a12ad623e?show_docid=0e0c012a12ad623e</guid>
  <author>
  rick.lich...@virgin.net
  (Turenne)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 20:25:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using HOL writing paper for personal gain?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/5c26175872c18e71?show_docid=5c26175872c18e71</link>
  <description>
  No. It is very obvious really. It has to do with the fact that a &lt;br&gt; peerage meant membership of the upper house of parliament. That was &lt;br&gt; its primary function. &lt;br&gt; An easy means of depriving someone of membership of either house of &lt;br&gt; parliament, would soon be open to abuse by whatever party happens to &lt;br&gt; be in power at the time, and happened to be short of a majority. Such
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/5c26175872c18e71?show_docid=5c26175872c18e71</guid>
  <author>
  susuha...@hotmail.co.uk
  (CJ Buyers)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 20:11:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using HOL writing paper for personal gain?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/14b614ff2c137687?show_docid=14b614ff2c137687</link>
  <description>
  Aaah...thanks. It seems strange that someone can lose his knighthood &lt;br&gt; but not his peerage. Is it anything to do with the fact that &lt;br&gt; knighthoods are honours and peerages are created by letters patent. &lt;br&gt; Richard L
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/14b614ff2c137687?show_docid=14b614ff2c137687</guid>
  <author>
  rick.lich...@virgin.net
  (Turenne)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 18:38:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Marie Antoinette and King Louis XVII</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/885f95623ef68cc9/e531135ed066b5e4?show_docid=e531135ed066b5e4</link>
  <description>
  Are you excessively dense, or just appallingly ignorant? The reason for &lt;br&gt; this is well known.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/885f95623ef68cc9/e531135ed066b5e4?show_docid=e531135ed066b5e4</guid>
  <author>
  john.brig...@ntlworld.com
  (John Briggs)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 18:36:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using HOL writing paper for personal gain?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/1c47d4e9c46cbfde?show_docid=1c47d4e9c46cbfde</link>
  <description>
  On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:07:59 -0700 (PDT), Turenne &lt;br&gt; Sir Joseph Kagan, Lord Kagan. Chairman of Gannex. &lt;br&gt; Knighted by Harold Wilson in 1970 (he funded Wilson&#39;s private office), &lt;br&gt; Life Peer 1976 in the infamous Wilson resignation &amp;quot;Lavender List&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Knighthood annulled in 1981. He was convicted of theft and false
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.am/group/alt.talk.royalty/browse_thread/thread/c363d6c6efe49afd/1c47d4e9c46cbfde?show_docid=1c47d4e9c46cbfde</guid>
  <author>
  talksinsenten...@gmail.com
  (James Dempster)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 17 մար 2010 18:24:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
